Alcohol Monitoring Through Skin
With law enforcement agencies trying new methods to stop individuals from drinking and driving, one developing technology is the use of continuous transdermal alcohol monitoring. In short, this system can recognize the presence of alcohol through a person’s skin.
While breathalyzers measure alcohol that exits the body through a person’s breath, transdermal monitoring can provide a solution that checks for alcohol consumption through sweat on the skin. Although the amount of alcohol lost through the skin in this way is slight compared to other means of alcohol processing, it is enough for this system to provide police with sufficient results.
Contact Austin DUI defense attorney Ian Inglis at 512-472-1950 for legal advice and a free consultation. If you have been charged with a DUI, knowing your rights can help you defend your freedom.
Continuous Transdermal Systems
Although not yet widely used across the country, these systems are gaining ground as important alternatives to breathalyzers. While breathalyzers measure alcohol levels with a decent amount of precision, they, compared to transdermal monitoring, can be significantly more invasive and expensive to the state. Transdermal monitoring systems work in the following ways:
- Measures the presence of alcohol at continuous rate
- Inexpensive
- Non-invasive
With these systems, alcohol monitoring no longer occurs a few times every week, but can reasonably be expected at an hourly rate. In this way, law enforcement officials can have a significantly more up-to-date understanding of the behaviors of individuals who have been convicted of DUI.
Contact Us
If you have been charged with DUI, your first priority should be to find a reliable defense attorney. Contact Austin DUI defense lawyer Ian Inglis at 512-472-1950 to learn more about your rights and options today.
The Ian Inglis web site is designed to provide educational information only and is not intended to offer legal advice. Information contained in this website is not intended to create an attorney-client relationship, nor does it constitute legal advice to any person reviewing such information. No electronic communication with Ian Inglis on its own will generate an attorney-client relationship, nor will it be considered an attorney-client privileged communication.